By Zola Pinda:
Zamikhaya Maseti’s latest analysis of Nicolás Maduro’s capture demonstrates intellectual rigour and the depth of insight often associated with Thabo Mbeki’s presidency. Like Mbeki, Maseti interrogates structural forces rather than merely chronicling events, situating Venezuela within a broader pattern of U.S. unilateralism and the erosion of multilateral norms.
He is correct: Maduro’s capture is less a rupture than a symptom of a global order already under strain. Washington frames the seizure and trial of Maduro as justice delivered.
Globally, however, it signals the audacious exercise of extraterritorial authority, unbound by law or institutional restraint. Vacuums in Venezuela invite fragmentation, loyalist resistance, and protracted instability. Sovereignty, once sacrosanct, is now negotiable, extended selectively and withdrawn strategically.
Africa is not immune to its structural vulnerabilities
States asserting sovereignty—Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger—signal principled resistance to conditional authority. By contrast, Nigeria and Kenya, constrained by dependency and bilateral alignments, reveal structural vulnerabilities within the continent.
Meanwhile, U.S. manoeuvres in the Democratic Republic of Congo and Rwanda highlight Africa’s strategic centrality and the transactional logic of American engagement.
Maseti correctly observes that Trump’s posture toward Africa is neither benign neglect nor oversight, but deliberate disregard for African agency.
The West is increasingly incoherent
The West itself is increasingly incoherent. Within the G7, the United States and the United Kingdom defend unilateral action as necessary, while France and Germany warn it undermines the UN. Japan and Canada proceed cautiously.
The so-called rules-based order is no longer a shared discipline: rigid for the weak, elastic for the strong. Economic coercion and military force now operate as a continuum, reshaping global alliances as Russia and China quietly build parallel networks of influence across the Global South.
Sovereignty cannot be passively defended
Africa’s response must be strategic, not reactive. Unity, principled multilateral engagement, and institutional strength remain essential. Sovereignty cannot be passively defended; it must be actively exercised.
History teaches that deliberate, coordinated action strengthens African influence in global affairs more than reactive diplomacy ever could. Maduro’s capture is a symptom—the deeper test is whether Africa will shape the emerging multipolar world or be reshaped by it.
Maseti’s work exemplifies what serious African analysis demands: patience, foresight, and clarity. He demonstrates that Africa’s voice, grounded in strategy and insight, remains consequential on the global stage.
Africa is capable of asserting norms, guiding institutions, and shaping outcomes
Like the leadership of Mbeki’s era, Maseti insists that African agency is not merely reactive to global pressures; it is capable of asserting norms, guiding institutions, and shaping outcomes.
In this context, the continent must act deliberately to ensure that its sovereignty, security, and strategic interests are no longer negotiable but commanding.
Zola Pinda is a veteran journalist, professional business communicator and former civil servant. – @NewsSA_Online
Please like, follow and engage with us on our social media platforms, links below: